Author summary
78% 18 analyzed articles/videos 17,680 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Bonavita results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 6,194 hits . Analysis detected 56,784 faulty-reasoning hits from 64,841 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 29% (6,063 of 8,524 authors). This Julia Bonavita is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group. Julia Bonavita
Author details
Total words: 64,841
Article count: 17
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score17 analyzed articles64.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.8% 7.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst