Author summary
93% 12 analyzed articles/videos 9,773 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter D'Abrosca results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 4,680 hits . Analysis detected 40,944 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,253 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 52% (4,186 of 8,557 authors). This Peter D'Abrosca is worse (more manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group. Peter D'Abrosca
Author details
Total words: 35,253
Article count: 10
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.1% percentile 2.3% BS Score10 analyzed articles35.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.3% 13.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst