Author summary
88% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,117 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jake Gibson results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 672 hits . Analysis detected 3,063 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,984 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,902 of 8,902 authors). This Jake Gibson is worse (more manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group. Jake Gibson
Author details
Total words: 2,984
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.4% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 22.5% 22.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 22.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.9% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Burden of Proof: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst