Author summary
66%6 analyzed articles/videos1,670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kelsie Cairns results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 962 hits. Analysis detected 9,722 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,504 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 53% (4,292 of 8,954 authors). This Kelsie Cairns is worse (more manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Kelsie Cairns
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
53%Kelsie Cairns (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,504
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

52% percentile
025507510052.1% percentile
2.3% BS Score6 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.7%5.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.0%6.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.6%4.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate