Topic summary
85% 25 analyzed articles/videos 20,835 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tech Industry results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 8,037 hits . Analysis detected 88,260 faulty-reasoning hits from 84,938 analyzed words across 25 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 36% (14,718 of 22,901 topics). This Tech Industry is better (less manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group. Tech Industry
Topic details
Total words: 84,938
Article count: 25
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score25 analyzed articles84.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst