Publication summary
59%98 analyzed articles/videos55,095 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Register results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 21,323 hits. Analysis detected 208,548 faulty-reasoning hits from 288,678 analyzed words across 98 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 39% (336 of 548 publications). This The Register is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
The Register
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Signal Cleveland1%
1%Montana Free Press1%
1%The Trace1%
1%BridgeDetroit1%
39%The Register (selected)2%
100%The White House9%
100%Utah Hockey Club10%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details
Total words: 288,678
Article count: 98
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

39% percentile
025507510038.8% percentile
1.3% BS Score98 analyzed articles288.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Publication 1.8%1.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Publication 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 6.7%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate