Author summary
76%18 analyzed articles/videos8,220 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ella Jackson results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 3,217 hits. Analysis detected 32,090 faulty-reasoning hits from 39,292 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 27% (6,391 of 8,642 authors). This Ella Jackson is better (less manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group.
Ella Jackson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
27%Ella Jackson (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 39,292
Article count: 18
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

26% percentile
025507510026.1% percentile
1.6% BS Score18 analyzed articles39.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.9%4.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate