Author summary
79% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,303 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Russell Brandom results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Optimism Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 901 hits . Analysis detected 8,035 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,212 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 43% (5,014 of 8,724 authors). This Russell Brandom is better (less manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group. Russell Brandom
Author details
Total words: 9,212
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.0% 5.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst