Author summary
43%4 analyzed articles/videos4,897 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Wiley results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 1,234 hits. Analysis detected 11,608 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,588 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 19% (7,331 of 8,946 authors). This Hannah Wiley is better (less manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group.
Hannah Wiley
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
19%Hannah Wiley (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 19,588
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

18% percentile
025507510018.1% percentile
1.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles19.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate