Author summary
53%3 analyzed articles/videos1,902 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Fitzgerald Rodriguez results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 1,348 hits. Analysis detected 8,449 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,400 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 31% (5,957 of 8,570 authors). This Joe Fitzgerald Rodriguez is better (less manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Joe Fitzgerald Rodriguez
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
31%Joe Fitzgerald Rodriguez (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 11,400
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

31% percentile
025507510030.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.8%11.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate