Topic summary
71% 28 analyzed articles/videos 15,065 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Endorsements results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 6,502 hits . Analysis detected 58,213 faulty-reasoning hits from 71,879 analyzed words across 28 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 22% (17,418 of 22,077 topics). This Political Endorsements is better (less manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group. Political Endorsements
Topic details
Total words: 71,879
Article count: 28
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score28 analyzed articles71.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst