Author summary
40%2 analyzed articles/videos425 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drew Dixon results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Quote-first Misdirection, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 207 hits. Analysis detected 999 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,566 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 49% (4,848 of 9,434 authors). This Drew Dixon is better (less manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group.
Drew Dixon
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
49%Drew Dixon (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,566
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

49% percentile
025507510048.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos