Publication summary
37% 35 analyzed articles/videos 31,002 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Florida Politics results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.3% saturation with 5,527 hits . Analysis detected 66,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 127,805 analyzed words across 35 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 23% (445 of 575 publications). This Florida Politics is better (less manipulative) than 77.40% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 127,805
Article count: 35
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.6% percentile 1.0% BS Score35 analyzed articles127.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst