Author summary
61% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gabrielle Russon results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 605 hits . Analysis detected 6,811 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,573 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 27% (6,286 of 8,541 authors). This Gabrielle Russon is better (less manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group. Gabrielle Russon
Author details
Total words: 9,573
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst