Author summary
83% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,105 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Channa Steinmetz results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 958 hits . Analysis detected 8,784 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,999 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 61% (3,780 of 9,471 authors). This Channa Steinmetz is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group. Channa Steinmetz
Author details
Total words: 7,999
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.1% percentile 2.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.5% 10.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 8.6% 8.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.0% 12.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst