Author summary
88% 12 analyzed articles/videos 9,423 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julianne McShane results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 4,850 hits . Analysis detected 35,869 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,319 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 39% (5,235 of 8,574 authors). This Julianne McShane is better (less manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group. Julianne McShane
Author details
Total words: 36,319
Article count: 12
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score12 analyzed articles36.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.3% 13.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst