BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Actor-Observer Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 718 faulty-reasoning hits from 800 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 31.8% and a BS Rank of 28% (22,117 of 30,695 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 72.10% of the article peer group.

Sens. 
John Cornyn, R-Texas, and Thom Tillis, R-N.C., have announced that they will support acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, all but assuring victory for President Donald Trump in his bid to install his former personal attorney in the role permanently. 
The Monday morning announcement from the senators came just hours after Blanche issued a document that appeared to terminate the Trump administration’s nearly $1.8 billion so-called anti-weaponization fund. 
The document also clarifies the scope of an agreement the Justice Department brokered between Trump and the IRS not to audit the president, his family or his businesses. 
The DOJ said the agreement only applies retroactively and to the president, his two eldest sons and the Trump Organization, as opposed to including “related or affiliated individuals” as the order originally stipulated. 
Those issues had been key sticking points for the senators. 
But the legal enforceability of these commitments is ambiguous. 
It’s not clear whether the document can officially change the terms of the IRS deal because it is not a formal order signed by Blanche. 
And while Blanche did issue a signed order formally rescinding the fund, the settlement agreement that ordered the creation of the fund remains in effect, and all parties to the original lawsuit, including the president and the IRS, would need to sign off to void it. 
As long as the settlement agreement remains valid, the government could theoretically revive the fund. 
In a statement released Monday morning, the lawmakers said they were “pleased” with the agreement, adding, “We want to express our gratitude to Mr. 
Blanche and his staff for working with us on this, and we look forward to voting to advance his nomination out of the Senate Judiciary Committee soon.” 
The news virtually guarantees Blanche’s confirmation to lead the DOJ on a permanent basis. 
The two senators were the key Republican holdouts on the Senate Judiciary Committee to advancing the nominee’s confirmation. 
Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, was forced to postpone a vote for Blanche’s nomination that was scheduled for last Thursday. 
That day, Blanche and Cornyn had a closed-door meeting to discuss what it would take for the Texas Republican to support the acting attorney general’s confirmation. 
Later Monday, Tillis defended the agreement he and Cornyn made with the Justice Department, responding to questions from MS NOW about the potential holes in the deal. 
“Another fund could be created because of the law. 
And I agree, we should change the law. 
But those same critics need to realize that these sorts of tools are available to anyone in the…White House based on current law. 
We should address the current law,” Tillis said. 
Tillis said he believes the Trump administration will abide by the terms of the agreement. 
And if Trump reneges, Tillis added that “he’d have to explain how breaking what I think is a very clear commitment squares with being honest and being the president of the United States.” 
If Trump reneges, Tillis added that “he’d have to explain how breaking what I think is a very clear commitment squares with being honest and being the president of the United States.” 
Trump has continued to vigorously defend the “anti-weaponization” fund  both in the court of law and the court of public opinion. 
In the Oval Office on Monday afternoon, the president told MS NOW’s Jake Traylor, “These people were treated horribly, and this fund could have given them some solace,” referring to Ashli Babbitt, the Jan. 6 rioter who was fatally shot by a police officer during the attack on the Capitol, and other insurrectionists. 
Asked by Traylor if he signed off on Blanche’s rescinding of the fund, Trump said he “didn’t look at it” and that he was not aware of other avenues through which people could be paid. 
“All I know is that Todd Blanche is great. 
He’s going to do a great job …,” Trump said, adding, “And I understand there’s been a sign-off, but I don’t know what they agreed. 
I think Todd Blanche agreed to reconfirm things that he’s already said, and what he said was okay.” 
The Senate Judiciary Committee is set to vote on Blanche’s nomination Tuesday at 9 a.m. 
ET, Grassley said in a post on X on Monday morning, adding that Blanche is the “right pick” for attorney general. 
Grassley also thanked Trump, Blanche, Cornyn and Tillis for working with him through the weekend “to get the votes to advance this well-qualified nominee.” 
The timing of a final vote on the Senate floor is less clear as senators aim to leave town for their August recess later this week. 
Jack Fitzpatrick and Mychael Schnell contributed reporting . 
The post Cornyn, Tillis throw support behind Blanche for attorney general appeared first on MS NOW . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.9%Julianne McShane: 3.7%MS NOW: 7.1%Confirmation Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.4%MS NOW: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Julianne McShane: 3.3%MS NOW: 3.6%Availability Heuristic2.8%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.7%MS NOW: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.8%MS NOW: 1.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Julianne McShane: 0.9%MS NOW: 2.4%Overconfidence Bias1.8%This article: 1.1%Julianne McShane: 11.0%MS NOW: 14.4%Framing Effect1.1%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.5%MS NOW: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.9%Julianne McShane: 0.4%MS NOW: 0.8%Status Quo Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.9%Julianne McShane: 1.0%MS NOW: 2.3%Optimism Bias6.9%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 1.0%MS NOW: 3.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 13.4%MS NOW: 18.1%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 10.4%Julianne McShane: 3.2%MS NOW: 2.3%Self-Serving Bias10.4%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.8%MS NOW: 2.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 8.1%Julianne McShane: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias8.1%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 3.5%MS NOW: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 1.2%MS NOW: 2.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Julianne McShane: 3.2%MS NOW: 2.0%Halo Effect1.1%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.4%MS NOW: 1.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 2.8%MS NOW: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.4%MS NOW: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.5%MS NOW: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 2.8%MS NOW: 4.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.7%MS NOW: 1.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.6%Julianne McShane: 4.9%MS NOW: 5.0%Appeal to Authority2.6%This article: 1.1%Julianne McShane: 1.0%MS NOW: 2.1%False Dilemma1.1%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.8%MS NOW: 2.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 3.7%MS NOW: 7.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.7%MS NOW: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.9%Julianne McShane: 1.0%MS NOW: 0.8%Bandwagon4.9%This article: 6.6%Julianne McShane: 5.5%MS NOW: 9.2%Appeal to Emotion6.6%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.9%MS NOW: 2.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.5%Julianne McShane: 2.9%MS NOW: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.5%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 1.6%MS NOW: 0.5%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.6%MS NOW: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 2.9%Julianne McShane: 0.4%MS NOW: 0.1%Appeal to Nature2.9%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.5%MS NOW: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 2.1%MS NOW: 2.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.6%Julianne McShane: 1.1%MS NOW: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.6%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.4%MS NOW: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.5%MS NOW: 1.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.4%Julianne McShane: 2.5%MS NOW: 2.5%Unattributed Quote6.4%This article: 6.6%Julianne McShane: 1.7%MS NOW: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection6.6%This article: 6.6%Julianne McShane: 3.5%MS NOW: 13.5%Biased Writer Voice6.6%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 1.2%MS NOW: 2.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 3.0%MS NOW: 5.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 1.3%MS NOW: 0.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julianne McShane: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

800 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers43%attributed speech460writer words
Selected voice

Donald Trump

75%flagged-word coverage
140 attributed words41% of attributed speech48% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Quote-first Misdirection+37.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 37.9%37.9%Biased Writer Voice-11.5 ptsWriter: 11.5%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-11.1 ptsWriter: 11.1%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.