Author summary
81%2 analyzed articles/videos1,175 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alex Griffing results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 561 hits. Analysis detected 3,875 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,700 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 55% (3,944 of 8,683 authors). This Alex Griffing is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
Alex Griffing
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
55%Alex Griffing (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,700
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

55% percentile
025507510054.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.0%10.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.3%3.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 11.9%11.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.9%4.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Author 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate