Topic summary
93% 69 analyzed articles/videos 48,421 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil Prices results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 15,184 hits . Analysis detected 139,780 faulty-reasoning hits from 195,859 analyzed words across 69 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 14% (21,104 of 24,545 topics). This Oil Prices is better (less manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group. Oil Prices
Topic details
Total words: 195,859
Article count: 69
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.0% percentile 1.3% BS Score69 analyzed articles195.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst