Publication summary
42% 32 analyzed articles/videos 28,262 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York Daily News results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 102,834 hits . Analysis detected 921,756 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,086,836 analyzed words across 449 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 53% (279 of 584 publications). This New York Daily News is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 1,086,836
Article count: 449
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score449 analyzed articles1.1M analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst