Author summary
97% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,824 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York Daily News Editorial Board results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 46.3% saturation with 3,376 hits . Analysis detected 15,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,296 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 87% (1,108 of 8,521 authors). This New York Daily News Editorial Board is worse (more manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group. New York Daily News Editorial Board
Author details
Total words: 7,296
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.0% percentile 5.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 46.3% 46.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 30.3% 30.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 18.1% 18.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 9.7% 9.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.6% 7.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.7% 8.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 46.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 30.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 18.1%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.9%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 8.7%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 7.6%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Burden of Proof: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.4% Recency Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst