Author summary
41% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,601 analyzed words
BS Summary: These R Eric Thomas results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 990 hits . Analysis detected 8,166 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,768 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 15% (7,302 of 8,524 authors). This R Eric Thomas is better (less manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group. R Eric Thomas
Author details
Total words: 13,768
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.3% percentile 1.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.2% 7.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.0% 0.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 7.2%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst