Author summary
88% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,611 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elaine Kurtenbach results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 1,349 hits . Analysis detected 8,987 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,719 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,880 of 8,706 authors). This Elaine Kurtenbach is worse (more manipulative) than 66.90% of the peer group. Elaine Kurtenbach
Author details
Total words: 8,719
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.9% percentile 2.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.5% 15.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.7% 10.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 8.6% 8.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.3%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst