BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Recency Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 843 faulty-reasoning hits from 648 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 19.1% and a BS Rank of 8% (24,313 of 26,280 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the article peer group.

TOKYO (AP)  The U.S. dollar weakened sharply Monday against the Japanese yen after U.S. 
President Donald Trump and Japan’s finance minister confirmed both sides had intervened in markets. 
Before late last week, the dollar was trading above 163 yen, touching 40-year highs. 
After regulators were suspected of stepping in, it fell below 160 yen. 
Early Monday, after the official announcement of the intervention, the dollar fell to nearly 155.20 yen. 
That’s a big drop for the exchange rate. 
The dollar was trading at 156.75 yen late Monday afternoon Tokyo time. 
Even though it has attracted millions of bargain-hunting tourists, the yen’s prolonged weakness against the dollar has been a source of frustration for Tokyo. 
Since Japan imports so much of what it consumes, a weak currency pushes prices higher. 
High oil prices have amplified that problem and that’s putting pressure on the administration of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi to do more to address the rising cost of living. 
Officials usually stay mum on such actions. 
But on Sunday, Trump confirmed that the U.S. side had helped, and Japanese Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama likewise issued a statement saying the finance ministry had purchased yen in coordination with the U.S. 
Treasury Department. 
“We will not hesitate to conduct further joint intervention,” she said. 
Such overt acknowledgment of market intervention is rare, said Neil Newman, managing director and head of strategy at Astris Advisory Japan. 
He said the last big example was when governments intervened following a massive earthquake and tsunami disaster in northeastern Japan in 2011. 
When asked why Washington was helping, Trump said Sunday that “We have a good relationship with Japan. 
We’re very strong —- very, very strong financially  and they are, you know, they have a weakening yen, and they wanted a little bit of help, and we’re always there for Japan. 
Japan’s been very good to us, with the exception, of course, of Pearl Harbor.” 
“It’s also good for the world economy,” he said. 
A weaker dollar makes U.S.-made goods more competitive, reducing their costs in yen terms, and might help increase American exports to Japan, Newman said. 
“It’s very rare that the Americans will work with the Japanese on this, but there is an alignment of interests here basically between Japan and America,” Newman said. 
It was a “low-cost” way for Washington to pay a favor to a key U.S. ally, while also protecting the stability of foreign exchange and bond markets, Shigeto Nagai, head of Japan economics for Oxford Economics, said in a report. 
Analysts question if the intervention worked 
The latest intervention appears to be having a more durable impact than earlier cases this year, and the yen may have a slightly stronger path for the rest of the year, Nagai said. 
But the factors that have contributed to the yen’s long-term weakness remain. 
Takaichi has pushed to cut Japan’s sales tax on food to 1% from 8% and to dramatically increase government spending. 
Such moves would tend to weaken the yen since it would increase inflation and add to Japan’s already massive government debt. 
The Bank of Japan has moved slowly to raise its benchmark rate from near zero to the current 1%, its highest level in 31 years but still well below the Federal Reserve’s rate of 3.5%-3.75%. 
It likely will continue to slow-walk any changes as it evaluates the impact of the Iran war and other factors on the economy, Nagai said. 
Meanwhile, a surge in oil prices because of the war and resulting higher inflation has kept the Fed from cutting rates. 
“The yield differential remains wide, Japan’s energy-import burden remains significant, and the Bank of Japan is still moving more slowly than the market would normally require to generate a sustained currency reversal,” Stephen Innes of SPI Asset Management said in a commentary. 
___ 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 17.7%Mayuko Ono: 1.4%AP News: 1.9%Confirmation Bias17.7%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Mayuko Ono: 1.5%AP News: 2.5%Availability Heuristic3.2%This article: 4.5%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic4.5%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Mayuko Ono: 0.5%AP News: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 1.2%AP News: 7.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 3.7%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion3.7%This article: 1.9%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.4%Mayuko Ono: 3.8%AP News: 2.1%Optimism Bias1.4%This article: 8.0%Mayuko Ono: 2.2%AP News: 1.9%Pessimism Bias8.0%This article: 11.3%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 8.8%Negativity Bias11.3%This article: 5.1%Mayuko Ono: 4.3%AP News: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias5.1%This article: 6.2%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error6.2%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Mayuko Ono: 1.7%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.7%Mayuko Ono: 0.7%AP News: 1.2%Recency Bias9.7%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.2%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 3.3%Appeal to Authority3.2%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 6.5%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning6.5%This article: 2.3%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 2.3%Hasty Generalization2.3%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 1.4%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.7%AP News: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 1.4%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.5%Begging the Question1.4%This article: 19.1%Mayuko Ono: 2.8%AP News: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)19.1%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.7%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Composition/Division3.7%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 1.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.2%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.2%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.3%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground4.3%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.3%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 1.9%Unattributed Quote0.3%This article: 1.7%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection1.7%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 2.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mayuko Ono: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

648 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers53%attributed speech303writer words
Selected voice

Stephen Innes

100%flagged-word coverage
42 attributed words12% of attributed speech73% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Unattributed Quote-0.7 ptsWriter: 0.7%Stephen Innes: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.