Topic summary
89% 38 analyzed articles/videos 14,747 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interest Rates results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 6,156 hits . Analysis detected 62,996 faulty-reasoning hits from 76,799 analyzed words across 38 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 21% (17,257 of 21,656 topics). This Interest Rates is better (less manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group. Interest Rates
Topic details
Total words: 76,799
Article count: 38
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score38 analyzed articles76.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst