Author summary
87% 5 analyzed articles/videos 628 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tiisetso Motsoeneng results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 489 hits . Analysis detected 2,667 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,270 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 71% (2,586 of 8,737 authors). This Tiisetso Motsoeneng is worse (more manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group. Tiisetso Motsoeneng
Author details
Total words: 3,270
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.4% percentile 3.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.9% 14.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.5% 6.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.5% Slippery Slope: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst