Keyword summary
71%3 analyzed articles/videos648 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U.s. Department Of The Treasury results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 722 hits. Analysis detected 3,616 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,384 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 53% (27,419 of 58,192 keywords). This U.s. Department Of The Treasury is worse (more manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group.
U.s. Department Of The Treasury
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
53%U.s. Department Of The Treasury (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

53% percentile
025507510052.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.4%13.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate