Author summary
83% 5 analyzed articles/videos 8,814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Boyle results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Overconfidence Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 2,832 hits . Analysis detected 36,381 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,862 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 49% (4,672 of 9,077 authors). This Matthew Boyle is better (less manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group. Matthew Boyle
Author details
Total words: 34,862
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles34.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.8% 5.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.7% 4.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst