Author summary
81% 10 analyzed articles/videos 4,199 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Gilbertson results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Overconfidence Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 2,196 hits . Analysis detected 19,817 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,223 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 52% (4,458 of 9,223 authors). This Nick Gilbertson is worse (more manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group. Nick Gilbertson
Author details
Total words: 18,223
Article count: 10
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.7% percentile 2.3% BS Score10 analyzed articles18.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.1% 12.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 8.0% 8.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst