Keyword summary
39% 2 analyzed articles/videos 914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Innes results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Pessimism Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 165 hits . Analysis detected 1,194 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,008 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 31% (40,231 of 57,948 keywords). This Stephen Innes is better (less manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group. Stephen Innes
Keyword details
Total words: 3,008
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.6% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Red Herring: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst