Topic summary
⁠88%5 analyzed articles/videos5,927 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Leadership results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 1,866 hits. Analysis detected 22,643 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,708 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (16,257 of 23,967 topics). This Military Leadership is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.
Military Leadership

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510032.2% percentile
1.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles23.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.0%5.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos