Publication summary
85%217 analyzed articles/videos283,943 analyzed words
BS Summary: These BBC results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 79,316 hits. Analysis detected 1,037,716 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,391,497 analyzed words across 215 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (320 of 571 publications). This BBC is better (less manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
BBC
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Signal Cleveland1%
1%Montana Free Press1%
1%Just Security1%
1%BridgeDetroit1%
44%BBC (selected)2%
100%The White House9%
100%Utah Hockey Club10%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

44% percentile
025507510044.0% percentile
1.4% BS Score215 analyzed articles1.4M analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 5.5%5.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 3.0%3.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Publication 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Publication 0.7%0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Publication 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate