Author summary
92%5 analyzed articles/videos6,291 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindsey Galloway results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 6,111 hits. Analysis detected 37,360 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,183 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 57% (3,855 of 8,907 authors). This Lindsey Galloway is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Lindsey Galloway
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
57%Lindsey Galloway (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 35,183
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

57% percentile
025507510056.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles35.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 17.4%17.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.4%5.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.5%5.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 11.1%11.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Author 17.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate