Topic summary
66% 31 analyzed articles/videos 22,506 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Concerns results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 8,571 hits . Analysis detected 79,534 faulty-reasoning hits from 112,011 analyzed words across 31 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 13% (20,567 of 23,430 topics). This Environmental Concerns is better (less manipulative) than 87.80% of the peer group. Environmental Concerns
Topic details
Total words: 112,011
Article count: 31
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.2% percentile 1.3% BS Score31 analyzed articles112K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst