Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Elton Jones results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Composition/Division, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 167 hits. Analysis detected 363 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,386 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 8,958 authors). This Elton Jones is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Elton Jones
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Elton Jones (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,386
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.1%12.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.5%2.5%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Author 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Composition/Division: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos