Publication summary
18% 16 analyzed articles/videos 10,040 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Maine Monitor results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 2,185 hits . Analysis detected 17,290 faulty-reasoning hits from 46,174 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 9% (506 of 556 publications). This The Maine Monitor is better (less manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 46,174
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.0% percentile 0.8% BS Score16 analyzed articles46.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst