Author summary
77% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,705 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bruce Parker results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 1,826 hits . Analysis detected 13,504 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,612 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 46% (5,028 of 9,217 authors). This Bruce Parker is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group. Bruce Parker
Author details
Total words: 13,612
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.4% 13.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 8.0% 8.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst