Author summary
100% 7 analyzed articles/videos 620 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brendan Ruberry results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Pessimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 43% saturation with 1,301 hits . Analysis detected 6,888 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,028 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.1% and a BS Rank of 94% (520 of 8,538 authors). This Brendan Ruberry is worse (more manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group. Brendan Ruberry
Author details
Total words: 3,028
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.9% percentile 8.1% BS Score7 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 43.0% 43.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 17.8% 17.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 12.9% 12.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.1% 15.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 9.5% 9.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.9% 14.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 17.0% 17.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 43.0%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 27.3%, sitewide 26.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 17.8%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 17.0%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.9%, sitewide 8.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 12.9%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 11.3%, sitewide 9.1% Recency Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.9%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst