Publication summary
27%8 analyzed articles/videos2,721 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WHYY results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 525 hits. Analysis detected 5,229 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,516 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 16% (471 of 556 publications). This WHYY is better (less manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group.
WHYY
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Signal Cleveland1%
1%Montana Free Press1%
1%The Trace1%
1%BridgeDetroit1%
16%WHYY (selected)1%
100%The White House9%
100%Utah Hockey Club10%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

15% percentile
025507510015.3% percentile
0.9% BS Score8 analyzed articles13.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate