Author summary
43% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,244 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Mueller results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 542 hits . Analysis detected 2,722 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,976 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 33% (6,391 of 9,471 authors). This Sarah Mueller is better (less manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group. Sarah Mueller
Author details
Total words: 4,976
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.9% 10.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.7% Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst