Topic summary
56% 17 analyzed articles/videos 11,411 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cultural Commentary results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 9,491 hits . Analysis detected 66,107 faulty-reasoning hits from 77,435 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 24% (18,751 of 24,576 topics). This Cultural Commentary is better (less manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group. Cultural Commentary
Topic details
Total words: 77,435
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.7% percentile 1.6% BS Score17 analyzed articles77.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
KTVU 26% 7/23/2026, 3:32:17 PM