Publication summary
33% 46 analyzed articles/videos 16,264 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KTVU results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 3,533 hits . Analysis detected 38,002 faulty-reasoning hits from 69,448 analyzed words across 46 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 25% (412 of 548 publications). This KTVU is better (less manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 69,448
Article count: 46
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.9% percentile 1.0% BS Score46 analyzed articles69.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
KTVU 33% 8/4/2026, 6:06:50 AM
KTVU 33% 8/3/2026, 11:03:30 PM
KTVU 33% 8/3/2026, 5:12:49 PM
KTVU 33% 8/3/2026, 5:37:56 AM
KTVU 33% 8/2/2026, 4:28:50 PM
KTVU 33% 8/2/2026, 3:57:47 PM
KTVU 33% 8/1/2026, 9:04:42 PM
KTVU 33% 8/1/2026, 5:27:59 PM