BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 329 hits. Analysis detected 2,222 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,165 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 18.7% and a BS Rank of 8% (25,582 of 27,739 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 92.20% of the article peer group.

What writer does not want one of their great epics to be made into a blockbuster, 2800 years after their death? 
On the other hand, writers are a prickly bunch and resist directors’ manhandling of their work. 
In ancient times, the tragedians directed their own plays, and Homer, even earlier than that, improvised and recited his/their own work. 
I was on the Greek islands of Tinos and Delos during the launch of Christopher Nolan’s enormously expensive, high grossing Odyssey . 
I missed the MAGA attacks on central casting (a black Helen of Troy, a transgender sidekick). 
I missed reading the lavish praise from the commercial press, whose job is to sell tickets. 
I missed the equally predictable snarky attacks from highbrows on the Left. 
I missed Rebecca Solnit’s mediation on ubiquitous rape in all foundational Western works. 
But since I was on rocky islands in the Aegean sea, I was able to commune with Homer’s shade in the underworld. 
Homer is bemused. 
He is gratified that his epic tale of return is being favored with such a lavish revival by the mega-director Christopher Nolan, despite the fact that Homer, the blind bard, is unable to see in IMAX Technicolor so it all feels like a garish display to him. 
He is, however, still able to hear the words of his great poetic work, now changed into an undistinguished vernacular. 
I was on the Greek islands of Tinos and Delos during the launch of Christopher Nolan’s enormously expensive, high grossing Odyssey . 
What, I asked, does Homer think? 
Back in New York, I am reading The Odyssey in Emily Wilson’s highly praised recent edition. 
I am struck by its childlike playfulness. 
It seems the proto- typical fairy tale, a magical world of constant transformations, reversals, improbable escapes, its catalogue of monsters, witches, its delight in sexual love, in golden riches. 
Improbable, horrifying, thrilling. 
Waves, barren, rocky volcanic mounds that sometimes look like monsters rising up, wind, the indescribable brilliance of what is frequently called the “wine-dark sea,” the crescent moon with Venus overhead, the primal beauty of the Greek islands. 
The Odyssey is the story of Odysseus trying to return home to his kingdom of Ithaka after ten years at war; this journey back will also take ten years. 
Partly because Odysseus must pay for the fact that he had the idea of the Trojan Horse. 
Odysseus, the trickster, tricked the Trojans into accepting the “gift” that de-stroyed their city. 
Now, the gods will work their trickery on him and his journey home will become an epic adventure. 
The Odyssey is also the story of our longing for “home,” a home we might once have known but which exists no longer, a home we never had but long for, a world we desire in which we feel at home, loved, revered, admired, safe, always out of reach 
But the Odyssey is also the story of our longing for “home,” a home we might once have known but which exists no longer, a home we never had but long for, a world we desire in which we feel at home, loved, revered, admired, safe, always out of reach. 
A home that is harsh and unforgiving but never dull, always surprising. 
The home that exists only in imagination. 
The Odyssey is a hymn to human imagination, the single trait we have that might set us apart from the rest of the animal world, our story telling, our longing. 
And telling stories allows us to love and revere the rest of the animal and verdant world. 
This is why Cafavy’s brilliant poem Ithaka defines the Odyssey as an interior journey: “you won’t encounter them [the many weird gods and creatures] unless you bring them along inside your soul.” 
Ithaka is not a place; it is a longing. 
Ithaka is not home, one cannot go there or arrive there, one can only strive, try, hope, remember and envision. 
Ithaka for Cavafy, and for all of us who read the Odyssey , who once heard it recited under the starry sky, against the beat of wind and wave, who thrill to its vivid descriptions of cyclops, Circe, the divine enchantress, storms, impossible bravery and foolishness, danger, desire, lust, wine, gold, rich, form-fitting robes, and the wine-dark sea, is forever out of reach. 
One strives for Ithaka, delights and fears and longs for the journey. 
Ithaka is about desire, and the poem suggests that without imagination, we might as well be dead. 
We will never arrive. 
Or if we get there, it will not be as we wished. 
We will continue to need to imagine more: beauty, magic, love, fear. 
The poem wakes us to impossible feats fueled by impossible desire. 
It pours life into our weary veins. 
One thing the Odyssey is not is an action-adventure story in which the hero fights and kills and fights and feels badly about all those he has killed, yet lives to fight and kill again, and again. 
The Odyssey is not the adolescent male fantasy of male muscle and female vagina, which evidently belongs to Christopher Nolan, the director who has stripped poetry, magic, imagination and desire in order to show sword fight after improbable sword fight, blood and guts, muscles and ridiculous feats of pseudo-bravery watched over by skinny women wanting to be fucked. 
Chris Hedges raves. 
He calls this film a testament to a failing civilization. 
He lauds Nolan’s incessant violence as an indictment of the incessant violence of America’s endless wars. 
He loves the brutality of the film; the ways in which it makes us feel and smell the blood. 
He loves the suffering of Odysseus, the post-traumatic stress that oozes from the eyes and voice of Matt Damon. 
Damon is so sorry that he killed. 
He cannot help himself but kill again, and again. 
The film is a travesty of the Odyssey , not its essence. 
As if Nolan read the Cliff Notes, and having no idea of the poem itself, its visual language, decided instead to shock and drag us through an ugly street fight that never ends. 
The film is a travesty of the Odyssey , not its essence. 
Far from being an indictment of American violence, the film is American violence. 
It is American excess, too. 
Obscenely costly. 
It makes us feel that we are doomed to be assaulted by outrageous cruelty and excessive spending until we die. 
That no other choice exists for any man but murder. 
The next big fight scene after the last big fight scene becomes an endless modern hell. 
The film feels as punishing as the daily atrocities of which we read and must endure. 
Recalling the wild beauty of the island, I wonder, again, what Homer thinks. 
“By killing my poetry, you have murdered me,” Homer said, and then he 
Karen Malpede is author of Last Radiance: Radical Lives, Bright Deaths, and 23 plays, including the forthcoming drama, Epstein Oratorio, or a Modern Hymn to Demeter. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.9%Elsie Carson: 3.9%The Indypendent: 3.9%Confirmation Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 0.1%The Indypendent: 0.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Elsie Carson: 2.1%The Indypendent: 1.9%Availability Heuristic4.9%This article: 2.5%Elsie Carson: 0.5%The Indypendent: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic2.5%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 0.3%The Indypendent: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 1.6%The Indypendent: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Elsie Carson: 3.1%The Indypendent: 3.2%Framing Effect8.5%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 0.5%The Indypendent: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 0.6%The Indypendent: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 0.2%The Indypendent: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.6%Elsie Carson: 4.1%The Indypendent: 3.6%Optimism Bias1.6%This article: 6.4%Elsie Carson: 1.4%The Indypendent: 1.1%Pessimism Bias6.4%This article: 26.9%Elsie Carson: 4.0%The Indypendent: 3.6%Negativity Bias26.9%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 0.7%The Indypendent: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 1.2%The Indypendent: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 0.1%The Indypendent: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 3.2%The Indypendent: 3.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 0.6%The Indypendent: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Elsie Carson: 1.7%The Indypendent: 1.4%Halo Effect2.6%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 0.2%The Indypendent: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 0.1%The Indypendent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.9%Elsie Carson: 0.7%The Indypendent: 0.7%Recency Bias1.9%This article: 1.4%Elsie Carson: 0.1%The Indypendent: 0.1%Primacy Effect1.4%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 0.0%The Indypendent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Elsie Carson: 0.7%The Indypendent: 0.6%Ad Hominem9.2%This article: 7.8%Elsie Carson: 0.5%The Indypendent: 0.4%Straw Man7.8%This article: 5.8%Elsie Carson: 1.6%The Indypendent: 1.3%Appeal to Authority5.8%This article: 3.4%Elsie Carson: 2.2%The Indypendent: 2.1%False Dilemma3.4%This article: 3.1%Elsie Carson: 0.9%The Indypendent: 0.9%Slippery Slope3.1%This article: 8.5%Elsie Carson: 0.2%The Indypendent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning8.5%This article: 6.3%Elsie Carson: 6.0%The Indypendent: 5.7%Hasty Generalization6.3%This article: 1.1%Elsie Carson: 0.0%The Indypendent: 0.0%Red Herring1.1%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 1.0%The Indypendent: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.6%Elsie Carson: 2.7%The Indypendent: 3.5%Appeal to Emotion10.6%This article: 2.6%Elsie Carson: 0.4%The Indypendent: 0.6%Begging the Question2.6%This article: 2.8%Elsie Carson: 1.3%The Indypendent: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.8%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 0.1%The Indypendent: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 0.2%The Indypendent: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 0.1%The Indypendent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 0.2%The Indypendent: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 14.7%Elsie Carson: 3.3%The Indypendent: 2.7%Anecdotal14.7%This article: 0.8%Elsie Carson: 0.1%The Indypendent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.8%This article: 5.7%Elsie Carson: 0.5%The Indypendent: 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.7%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 0.0%The Indypendent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 0.2%The Indypendent: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 0.1%The Indypendent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 0.0%The Indypendent: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Elsie Carson: 0.2%The Indypendent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.0%Elsie Carson: 0.6%The Indypendent: 0.8%Unattributed Quote4.0%This article: 3.9%Elsie Carson: 0.2%The Indypendent: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection3.9%This article: 28.2%Elsie Carson: 5.8%The Indypendent: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice28.2%This article: 6.8%Elsie Carson: 2.2%The Indypendent: 2.1%Indoctrination6.8%This article: 2.1%Elsie Carson: 4.1%The Indypendent: 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias2.1%This article: 1.4%Elsie Carson: 0.0%The Indypendent: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias1.4%This article: 1.4%Elsie Carson: 0.1%The Indypendent: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.4%

1165 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker7.1%attributed speech1,082writer words
Selected voice

Chris Hedges

88%flagged-word coverage
83 attributed words100% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Biased Writer Voice-30.4 ptsWriter: 30.4%Chris Hedges: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-7.3 ptsWriter: 7.3%Chris Hedges: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-4.3 ptsWriter: 4.3%Chris Hedges: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-4.2 ptsWriter: 4.2%Chris Hedges: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-2.3 ptsWriter: 2.3%Chris Hedges: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -1.5 ptsWriter: 1.5%Chris Hedges: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.5 ptsWriter: 1.5%Chris Hedges: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.