Publication summary
53% 12 analyzed articles/videos 8,785 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Indypendent results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 2,994 hits . Analysis detected 30,937 faulty-reasoning hits from 53,527 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 32% (379 of 550 publications). This The Indypendent is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 53,527
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.1% percentile 1.1% BS Score12 analyzed articles53.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst