Keyword summary
â 50% 1 analyzed article/video 1,982 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher-Nolan results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 1,717 hits . Analysis detected 5,841 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,928 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of â 41% (32,013 of 53,561 keywords). This Christopher-Nolan is better (less manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group. Christopher-Nolan
Keyword details
Total words: 7,928
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 21.7% 21.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.7%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst