Author summary
45% 1 analyzed article/video 724 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Margo Vansynghel results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Quote-first Misdirection , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 301 hits . Analysis detected 1,534 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,896 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 58% (3,657 of 8,526 authors). This Margo Vansynghel is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group. Margo Vansynghel
Author details
Total words: 2,896
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.1% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.1% Indoctrination: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst