Author summary
68% 14 analyzed articles/videos 904 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Here results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 918 hits . Analysis detected 4,715 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,845 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,694 of 8,706 authors). This Here is worse (more manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group. Here
Author details
Total words: 3,845
Article count: 14
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.6% percentile 4.0% BS Score14 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 20.5% 20.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 8.5% 8.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 6.8% 6.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 23.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.5%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 18.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Recency Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.4% Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst