Topic summary
28% 12 analyzed articles/videos 9,265 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Programs results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4% saturation with 1,551 hits . Analysis detected 18,455 faulty-reasoning hits from 38,760 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 4% (21,597 of 22,470 topics). This Community Programs is better (less manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group. Community Programs
Topic details
Total words: 38,760
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.9% percentile 1.0% BS Score12 analyzed articles38.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst