Publication summary
50% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,046 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The TRiiBE results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 1,027 hits . Analysis detected 5,348 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,802 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 61% (228 of 570 publications). This The TRiiBE is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 8,802
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 11.7% 11.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 11.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst