Author summary
77% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,748 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Special to El Paso Matters results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 721 hits . Analysis detected 8,939 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,170 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 55% (4,150 of 9,133 authors). This Special to El Paso Matters is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group. Special to El Paso Matters
Author details
Total words: 9,170
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst